Cloverfield, quickly

The short of it is that it's worth the hype. The long of it is spoilery and after the jump and not very long at all, really.

I most appreciate Cloverfield's economy, its ability to triumph over its considerable constraints. It is, first of all, PG-13 horror, a genre practically guaranteed to pussy out at the most unsatisfying places so as not to offend any delicate sensibilities. While the disembodiment in Cloverfield is kept to a minimum (which is to say: at a disappointing level for my taste), I never got the sense that the monster was anything less than a brutal threat, perhaps even a vindictive one. That we don't see more of its wrath written on bodies (or pieces of them) is testament to its power (it can crush people into nonexistence, right?). But it's also tangible evidence of the film's conceit: because we're only treated to what our man-on-and-running-from-the-scene cameraman can catch, the gratuitousness we'd be treated to in an R-rated flick just would not make sense here (or, at the very least, exclusion of blood and guts seems plausible). The shaky, always-moving camera just cannot catch much of anything, including the monster himself. And here's where more economy comes in: the film was made for $25 million, says Entertainment Weekly, and from the offset, was promised to be brought in at under $30 million from J.J. Abrams. No Cloverfield character knows anything aside from snatches they pick up via serendipitous news broadcasts because they can't really see anything: the whole point is to get as far away from the monster as possible. Besides, if anyone gets too close, surely he or she will face wrath. And so, in one swoop, fear of the unknown is exploited in the most money-saving, MPAA-soothing way possible. It's as though the film itself is highly evolved (in its commercially cinematic way). It is truly, a sight to behold.

I loved so much of it: the conceit, the commentary on our documentary culture (a relevant spin on the found-footage template brilliantly arranged by Cannibal Holocaust), the snatches of information we are given (the fake news broadcasts felt so real, that still days later when I turn on CNN, my first impulse is relief that the whole monster thing isn't still going on ), the monster itself (kind of reptilian, kind of amphibious, kind of insect-like...the more I saw it, the more I wanted to know about it). And the stuff that I loved, I really loved. It, in my mind, all was adequate compensation for the aspects of the film that were fucking horrible, namely all of the characters. I really thought that the first 20 minutes of watching these annoying voids fret over their one-dimensional socializing would serve as a contrast to the catastrophe that materializes (i.e. see how all petty problems are put into perspective in the face of disaster?), but no: that fretting persists and ends up driving the idiot characters to do idiotic things like completely abandoning any fight-or-flight impulses for puppy love and/or a lemming-like attachment to the sufferer of puppy love. The Rob character (played by Michael Stahl-David) is such an asshole for putting himself and his friends at considerable risk to first travel from downtown to midtown to find this dead chick he banged. Once there, he proves to be an even bigger asshole for attempting to get to her by ascending the building adjacent to hers (since hers has been attacked and is, in fact, leaning up against it) and finally leaping from that building to hers. And then, he proves to be a bigger asshole still, for when he finally reaches her and she's dead from a spike driven through her body, he talks to her. And then, she's turns out to be the biggest asshole of all for actually being alive and coming to at the exact moment her help has arrived. It's so fucking stupid, but not more stupid than a cell phone working in a subway station. Even though Mark claims that the Spring Street station does get full service, that probably at least depends on the service provider and would be less likely since the city is, you know, in a state of pandemonium and the cell towers have most likely been demolished. The only thing that's more fucking stupid than that is what happens when Rob answers his phone: he says, "Mom?" For all the melodrama that the movie promotes, Douglas Sirk should get an honorary writing credit.

All of this is to say that I just wished the film had followed a different group of people as they were affected by those first few hours of the monster attack (and because that could very well be the case, I think sequel possibilities, following different parties and their ordeals, are endless). If only the characters were as extraordinary as the events depicted, I'd have no problem labeling Cloverfield a classic. For now, it'll just have to settle with being iconoclastic.

Comments

[Dan]

Equally Stupid: Getting from Spring Street Station to 59th Street Station on foot, underground, in the dark, in about 10 minutes flat.
Also, walking out of the Time Warner Center and somehow finding yourself at the Grand Central Underpass.
I'll suspend disbelief for a 25-story high monster, but this little stuff hurts my brain.

[Cheri]

Nice write up about the movie. I agree 100% with the dislike of the characters and their complete stupidity. The movie overall disappointed me...I prefer at least a few questions answered. :-)

[ridwah]

I loved 75% of it, mostly because I couldn't stand the characters. I believed the condensed subway walk because Hud kept turning the camera off. In fact, that's the only way I believe the camera battery didn't run out at all. There's only about an hour of "footage" not including what was pre-existing on the tape. I just couldn't believe the girls spending 8+ hours running all over Manhattan in strappy heels.

[Fredo]

The thing that sucks is that the camera work got me nauseous, so i had to leave after 30 minutes. Yeah, the characters where mighty weak, so leaving because of the nausea was a okay for me. It's strange because i was fine watching Blaire Witch. Your description of the movie i missed seems good. But again, mighty weak characters.

Just started reading your blog. It's great and I like Winston. I just found out my friend got her cat because she wanted one that looked like Winston.

[Sven]

Great, concise review of the film, Rich. I loved this movie--not only because it's perversely fascinating to see big cities smashed up by monsters--but because it resonated unexpectedly with me on an emotional level. I can't stop thinking about it.

No, I have never been in the same place as a terrorist attack or natural disaster, and overall I agree that most of the characters came directly from the disposable "Felicity" casting headshot reject pile. However, I was breathless the entire time I watched those kids crawl through New York City, because I truly got a sense of how fucking scary it is to be in the midst of chaos, not knowing what's going on or how to stop it. For this I especially applaud J.J. Abrams and what's-his-name-the-director for answering as few questions about the monster as possible, and tapping into our collective national angst about being affected by violence at random, all while putting together some really exciting action set pieces.

[studpup]

i still don't know if it's worth all the hype, but i pretty much agree with your review. and i really did hate the characters; the actors weren't helping either. i would have been okay if they all got crushed by the big monster. ah well. oh and the little stuff, like how fast the got from place to place and how fast the military mobilized (and set up virtual hospitals), irked me while i was watching the film - not enough to turn me off completely, but enough to irk me :)

p.s. i know some of the viral marketing stuff tried to imply the government was somewhat prepared for the 'attack', but come on.

[Kyle-Steven]

So my main driving factor to see this was the fact that I actually know Michael (Rob), because I'm not a terribly large fan of horror/terror movies. After seeing it, aside from being nauseated (just like Blair Witch - I didn't even have a platter of gooey nachos this time), I was just kind of annoyed with how the last third of the movie plays out. From the girl exploding (did she do that on her own out of nowhere or did they kill her?) to traversing a 59-story, cross-building, not horizontal or vertical trek to rescue your impaled ex (in HEELS for that chick), to then remove impaled ex and her NOT BE DEAD and able to run 20-something odd blocks to safety and still NOT BE DEAD, to conveniently being knocked out of the sky in your helicopter and NOT DIE WHEN IT CRASHES, to then escape but be in the throes of this vaguely defined monster and get the cameraman killed but leave the two most irritating characters left to "die" in each others arms (because they probably didn't, seeing as how they're bionic)...it was enough to make me slightly more than irked. I paid for two of my friends to see it with me, so I guess I got around 22 of my 33 dollars worth, but still...bah.

[Andy]

And seriously, as much as I love Roma Torre, there's no way she was hanging out at the NY1 studios on a Friday or Saturday night, ready for an sudden emergency broadcast.

I totally agree about the movie in general, though I forgave the crappiness of the characters, mostly because poor judgment (running toward the monster, into a falling building) was required for good video footage. If Rob and Hud and co. had tossed the camera immediately and/or looked for a logical escape route, we'd have been left with either no movie or a really boring movie.

[Dawn]

Hey, great review!
I thought the characters were annoying as well!

BTW, is that Brittany from ANTM cycle 4 on the Cerebral Itch ad on your page? It looks just like her!

[janet]

who cares? stick to the script rich.

[drew]

Agreed. I think this movie succeeds in that it kept me enthralled despite holes in logic and the douchebagginess of the characters. But are the problems really so problematic? It's a monster movie, after all, and humans characters in this genre have behaved more illogically before. I feel like people complaining of head-hurting should ask if they were expecting too much from a trifle of a movie whose plot can be basically summed up with "Big thing stomps city. Screaming."

[JC]

I agree with some of your points, Rich--the characters were pointless--but I'm not ready to call this a classic, nor will I ever be. The Blair-Witch-with-a-horrible-seizure-disorder camera work almost made me boot, and I wasn't the only one.

But here's my bigger complaint: As someone who was working and living in the city during 9/11, I found a few of the scenes to be extraordinary uncomfortable. Watching NY1 with a group of panicky people to find out what's happenning? Been there. Hiding out in a convenience store while a cloud of smoke/soot washes through the streets? Yeah, been there, too. I almost had to walk out at that point because I started to freak out a little. And it wasn't because it was such an effective horror movie--I think it was more because I was being manipulated.

Now, I'm not going to be one of those people who says that the movie should be pulled/banned because it offended my sensibilities. I don't really care. I should have known better not to see it, as a movie about the destruction of NY might push my buttons, much in the same way I suspect Vietnam vets probably wouldn't be into "Full Metal Jacket" or "Platoon." And maybe the filmmakers "borrowing" ideas from 9/11 isn't really that bad or evil--there are certainly more than a few horror movies that feature people burning alive, and I'm not aware of any major opposition based on the grounds that this happend in the Holocaust. But as I said, I personally felt manipulated, and not in a good way, and I think co-opting scenes from 9/11 was a bit tasteless

[Leanne]

Heath Ledger was just found dead of a drug overdose in Manhattan. Holy shit!!!

[Angelmonster]

See I didn't think 9/11 at all until the very end of the movie. The whole scene with them in the convenience store was as the monster was walking by them, not just debris from a building falling.
I can forgive the camera effect and the one sided characters. I can not forgive the impailed girl walking halfway across the city totally fine with just a rag wrapped around her gushing wound. I can not forgive the one girl exploding and no answers given to why she exploded. Fine, the monster is there and we can chose where it came from but why the head exploding? She was the only one out of the bunch that was a semi-decent character in the movie(she would have been the best if she said "f*** you" and left them all behind on the streets).
The last thing I can not forgive is the monster hitting the helicopter just after it was fire bombed THEN getting to central park right where the main characters were. Then the only char interested in filming the whole thing dies but no, can't leave it there, the last two characters have to grab the camera to say their goodbyes. Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame!

[Shana]

I completely agree. The parts I enjoyed about the movie were amazing, but the parts I didn't like, I really hated. It's good to see a review that's something other than "amazing!" and "worthless!" because I definitely didn't think of it either way.

[bigpikchur.blogspot.com]

Did you hear the backwards whispering at the very end? They played it in reverse (so, frontwards!) on the radio this a.m.; definitely going to be a sequel.
Jules
House of Jules

[shocka]

totally agree with kyle-steven. the creature(s) design was interesting, and some of the action pieces were entertaining. but overall i thought the movie was disappointing, laughably so in some places. rent "the host" instead. better on all fronts.

[Jason]

See, I had trouble with the fact that the girl Lily left her heels on for that entire subway tunnel walk, but I didn't have a problem with how short it seemed in the film because it's entirely possible that Hud had the camera off for some of that time. There were moments where time skipped forward a bit through the whole film like that. They could've been walking for a much longer time than we saw. But Lily should've ripped some fucking Keds off a corpse or something.

[TT]

Uh, the girl who exploded was bitten/stung by the one of the lice-looking things in the subway, who clearly injected her with some kind of poison (if it was a lice-like parasite, it would have to have a mighty powerful anticoagulant to feed off the monster). Therefore, she went splat. How did people miss that? It seemed pretty obvious to me.

[Reese]

Rich you are so on point although you loved the movie more than I did. I just couldn't get past the poor plot point of going INTO the city to rescue one person (thus, putting three other people's lives in danger just to rescue someone who may or may not be dead). My friends and I laughed throughout the movie because of this. In fact, I told my best friend that I loved her, but if monsters were terroizing Miami, even if she was on the phone with me at that moment, I would not go into downtown to get her. I'd already be mourning her loss.

If only they had tweaked the story a little bit. How about following the army out of the city, getting separated from the army, and struggling on their own to reach the evac point? That would have been 100 times better then, "We have to save Beth."

Bleh. For all the good that the movie had, that stupid plot point ruined it for the realist in me. For that reason, I could only give the movie a C (and I'm usually pretty generous with rating movies). Sad.

[LisaL]

I totally loved this movie. I agree that the characters were hellava stupid, but well.. there wouldn't have been a movie otherwise if they had done the smart thing :P heh I loved Hud though!
There were some parts that I felt were just too cheesy and made me want to throw something through the screen.
When they finally find the girl in the building, and the oh so fucking cheesy ass "You came back for me..." UUUUUUUUUGH. It totally took me out of the movie when she said that absolutely horrible cheesy crap line.
And also when walking through the clothing store... I was waiting for Lily to grab a pair of non-heeled shoes.. but nope!
I guess those heels were really comfy o_O

Anyways.. blahblahblah.. bad acting, bad scenes aside... the absolute best scene I think was when the 4some was walking down the street. All of a sudden there's the monster in front of them, and then WHOOSH, there goes a missle right over their heads from the military behind them. And then all hell breaks loose as the military is attacking the monster. That part... w/ the sound it totally made me feel like I was right there with them. So intense!

[kily]

Oh, so nice discussion, and so reasonable comments. But i wanna say in the past 2 weeks I have been to several forum sites about interracial relationship etc and to my surprise, I find that many people just interested in my hot pics and videos not my mind on http://multiraciallove.com …what a pity!

[Parker]

After reading your review I decided to watch a 'magic' copy of it..willing to go to the theater the next day to see it for real effect. Won't be doing that. I can't sit through the first 20 mins again. There is way too much emphasis on the part of the movie that really sucks. These characters are not just flaws in the movie..they make it a fuckin disaster.

I can take action movie hyperbole (he keeps the camera going despite how vulnerable filming makes him, woman smart enough to take off heels but dumb enough to still carry them, the unconscious spike-thru-chest woman who can suddenly cuddle and run and yell) but I cannot accept that the unfunny funnyman continues to make jokes after tragedy after tragedy ("what's oh-600?-6 o'clock.-Oh yeah I knew that") Fuck. You. Script writer.

Is this a means to an end thing? Critics accept this because it's a YouTube post-modern version of Godzilla? Eh eh. Also, how in the world did this cost 25 million dollars to make? Perspective: Blair Witch cost $22,000. Special effects don't explain it.

[pricolatino]

You said exactly what I was thinking. The movie got to me in the last 10 minutes, in regards to motion sickness, the rest of the time I was fine.

The only character I cared for was exploding girl, she kinda reminded me of all those 80's Winona Ryder odd-girl characters. I thought the exploding part was because she had been implanted with a spider baby, which somehow grow really fast (she was already about to pass out when they caught her, to me that meant the alien "baby" was about to come out, hence the explosion), but that was my interpretation of it, of course.

And she had to die, of course, for being an asshole. She wasn't even that close to those people, but she decided to stick with them while they crawled closer and closer to ground zero.

All in all, an ok movie, not worth the $10 I would've paid to see it. Fortunately I caught a free pre-screening of it, so I only spent $4 on raisinets.

[ekar]

I thought it sucked but mainly becuase of the characters and their stupid ways. I wanted to see more monster less dumb people but I guess with such a budget it wasn't possible. Still, the movie did a good job in leaving enough things unanswered so that despite my best intentions, I know I'll be seeing the sequel.

[ekar]

Also, I would have hated to have been in NY on 9/11 and to have seen that movie.

[momorg]

Sigh, I wish there had been commentary on our documentary culture but the film seemed to have no subtexts whatsoever. Nice Cannibal Holocaust shout out though. Also, everyone goes on about the subway sequence, it might just be me, but it felt pretty similar to the underground night vision attack in 28 weeks later which was more effective.

[Liz]

I just came back from seeing it. I really wanted to see what people thought of it on here because after the movie was over, people did not say one word in the theater. I liked the movie; I didn't love mainly because of the characters. I couldn't believe these girls ran around the city in heels! What was more unbelievable was the dead girl coming to life when Rob got to her. SOOO CHEESY. I knew they were going to die together.

The beginning of the film got me a little dizzy. My friend almost walked out! LOL Overall, I liked the movie. I was a little bit uncomfortable when they hid in the convenience store. I'm a New Yorker, and 9/11 doesn't seem like that long ago to me. I was a little bit uneasy, and it brought back bad memories. The only thing that got me about the movie is how the guy kept filming when the monster was right near him. LOL I know it's for the sake of the movie, but I would have been running fast as hell instead of standing there staring at the monster. ;)

[August]

What I want to know is: what the hell did all the viral marketing on the internet have to do with this movie? (John Haas Was Right, or whatever it was called). In the end, it was just a new way of doing a monster movie. Saved, at least for me, by the fact that I found the main character really handsome. But I'm easy to please like that...

[md]

For me, the viral marketing made the film better. There's a whole back story and resulting theories on how things came to be. It just makes it more of an experience than just watching a movie because there is also, as my friend calls it, "homework" involved. But I guess you have to be really into the movie to do all that.

And I couldn't believe the heel thing either. Ugh, I think at some point I would risk the bottoms of my feet and go barefoot. If Lily didn't want to steal from the store or a corpse, she could have at least asked Beth if she could borrow some flats or sneakers after they un-impaled her.

And I didn't mind all of the non-answers in the film. The film was purely from their perspective, and they didn't know what the hell was going on either.

[Pig]

And maybe I missed it but Hud got the camera from Rob's brother right? There was all that annoying footage of the brother and the gf in the beginning. So why was there footage of Rob and Beth at the end? Do they share a camera?

[ariane]

there's a strange banner on your site for something called "Cerebral Itch" that makes generically "funny" t-shirts... BUT, I think ANTM's good 'ol Brittany (the funny one, not the one with the ratty Barbie hair) is their model. Anyone else?

[superlotado]

@ Pig: at the very beginning of the movie, Rob's brother says "I don't know how to use this, it's not even my camera." So we're supposed to believe he got the camera from his brother, and started recording on the tape that was already in it, which had the footage of Rob and Beth on it. Rob freaks out about it during the party when he asks Hud about it and realizes he's taping over his precious day with Beth.

Anyway, I pretty much agree with this review. I liked lots of things about the movie but disliked some too. I didn't feel the stupid characters or their stupid decisions ruined it for me because that's just par for the course in these kinds of movies, and also I was pretty much expecting it due to JJ Abrams' involvement. If the characters in any of his tv shows or movies ever acted logically, the whole thing would be over in about 5 minutes.

And the girl who went splat did so because she was infected with something when she got bit--thought that was pretty obvious.

[mark]

JC: "But here's my bigger complaint: As someone who was working and living in the city during 9/11, I found a few of the scenes to be extraordinary uncomfortable. Watching NY1 with a group of panicky people to find out what's happenning? Been there. Hiding out in a convenience store while a cloud of smoke/soot washes through the streets? Yeah, been there, too. I almost had to walk out at that point because I started to freak out a little. And it wasn't because it was such an effective horror movie--I think it was more because I was being manipulated."

Sorry I guess JJ Abrahms forgot that EVERYTHING IS ABOUT YOU. Get over it for chrissakes....

[Carmine]

Just saw the movie, I liked it (?) I'm still feeling ill...

I read on another site that the very end of the credits there's a "It's still alive" comment. Also, I read about something falling into the water at Conney Island it the end of the film. The producers have apparently stated that any sequel will deal with other groups of people and the events from their perspectives...so basically we could have the same movie 100000000x over.

[SKR]

I just finished seeing the movie, and I surprisingly did not have a problem with the characters. They are really not that different than a lot of the people you would meet on an everyday basis. Sure, they seem to have more money and status, but frankly most people prattle on about their lives in such a manner. I think that just magnified the scope of the catastrophe, that money and status won't protect you in a disaster, the stakes for everyone are equal. This first person cameraman style of filmmaking is SO much better served by this story than Blair WItch Project could ever have hoped to be. Disasters are most commonly understood best by people when its felt on an intimate, human level. The conceit of having the events of the film restricted to the limited subjectivity of some of the random people experiencing it brilliantly encapsulates that sense of dismay and desperation, of being lost in a familiar place rent by quicksilver destruction, and it facilitates that Lewton-esque belief in the terrifying power of suggestion over the obvious. And the seamless echoes of 9/11 without resorting to trite didacticism and tacky dialogue was really impressive. When was the last time a piece of enjoyable popular entertainment said so much so effortlessly?

[Shazz]

Well said, SKR. I'm looking forward to getting the dvd.

[erik]

While I liked the premise and the creature design, I thought the bulk of the movie was just idiotic.

The movie would have been 1000% more powerful if they had just discarded the folly of the handheld camera and switched to a third-person perspective. There is a lot to be said for shooting from the impersonal angle of 3rd person... I found myself wondering the WHOLE time why the hell Hud would ever keep filming. Why, after being attacked inthe subway, would he pick up the camera. Why he would film rather than help his friend carry his "girlfriend" across the chasm between the towers of Time Warner Center. It was a colossaly bad decision.

I'm totally fine with limiting the amount of information provided about the creature; I don't need to or want to what the thing is. I'm also totally fine with following a limited group of characters around and seeing things from only their point of view (although I would have preferred a slightly smarter group of characters that don't blindly run into the mayhem). Just lose the stupid handy-cam, I mean who uses these things anymore anyway?

In addition, the actual direction of plot could have used some serious adjustment. I mean, whose decision was it to inject them into the maelstrom through the contrivance of having them rescue the one-night-stand at TWC? There were so many other ways they could have come into contact with the creature and parasites. The Brooklyn Bridge was destroyed; they could have had to run the gauntlet through the Holland Tunnel, or trying to get to the Lincoln Tunnel.

Just bad decisions that resulted in a weak film.

[?????]

I find it rather interesting that so many of us have deemed ourselves expert critics by addressing the obvious flaws in this film, myself included. I only can speak for myself but when I decide to go to see a movie, particularly a sci-fi/fantasy/horror movie, I go to be entertained- and nothing more.
Movies are fantasies, stories with many limitless possibilities, not reality based depictions of what would happen if we had a gigantic monster land unexpectedly smack dab in the middle of one of the most populated cities in the United States.
Funny thing is that for all credited with the creation, production and especially the marketing associated with this release, all of our comments, good, bad and those that don't know how to use spell check - only reinforce the genius behind the scenes that helped make this film so popular.

-JAMIE
I LEFT THE THEATER READY TO SEE THE FILM AGAIN, 7 HOURS LATER STILL CAN'T STOP THINKING ABOUT IT...(um, and I agree with all of the complaints that no girl can last that long running through the streets in heels)

[Elizabeth]

Personally, I like my horror/disaster movie characters good and dumb. Most people's brains go flying straight out the window when a crisis hits, because they've got no training and no experience. Even smart people end up going back for the cat sometimes.

[lattegirl]

Until now I have studiously avoided reading the spoilers for this movie, but because Rich wrote a review, I couldn't resist. Now I know I'll be renting the DVD, not paying theatre prices.

PS: I can shop for up to eight hours in heels. They should cast me in the sequel.

[sir jorge]

The marketing of this film seems far too much like someone got paid to promote it online.