Follow RichJuz on Twitter

I'm So Into You

« The days of choosing between volume and length are over | Main | You will see me again »

Comments

norman

these are high class problems. get over it.

Mike

you know this, but it's not your content to begin with so no one is required to credit you and it's silly for you to try to claim ownership of it. this is what happens when you spend all of your time sitting back, criticizing and ripping apart and picking at the scraps of other people's work rather than creating your own.

Chance

Dear Mike,

Don't be a dick.

Love, Chance

Bart

It's not about Rich claiming ownership. What he's doing is social commentary and if someone's going to "quote" it they should give him credit just like they might quote an Opinion piece at the Times or spend the time finding a different set of clips that he did to find his.

torrinpaige

Having edited a few things in my day, I know how much work goes into collecting, collating, and editing down all this stuff. Just because you don't get paid for it (your blog content), doesn't mean it's not work. I am getting quite tired of people pilfering others' hard work and then not citing it. In a way it's flattering that you're the go-to guy for all things pop-culture ridiculousness, but would it really hurt them so much to say, "Thanks, Rich, for doing the dirty work for us! Go and check out fourfour for more pop-culture goodness!" This shit is getting so lame, Rich. I feel pissed off for you.

Carly

Actually, because what you were doing with the clips is a "transformative" use, your work is fair use and copyrightable. Mike would make a terrible law troll. Anywho, because the Insider used your work for essentially the same purpose as you did (celebrity gossip, humor, etc.) their use is not transformative. Their work is also commercial, not pure news reporting, and samples more from your work than is necessary for their purposes, so not fair use. There's also an argument to be made that their use devalues your work, and deprives you of the potential licensing fee you could have gotten for it. I knew law school would be good for something! Give 'em hell.

Tone_def

Carly's got it spot on. Additionally, the amount that someone takes isn't a hard and fast rule-- even 2 seconds of your video could be infringing if they were "the heart of the work".

Rich's transformative fair use of copyrighted material creates a new, original work of authorship, which he has exclusive rights to. The Insider lifting it in this way, with no transformation (as carly mentioned), constitutes flat-out infringement.

Fiona

Rich, if you stopped providing this content, I bet they would pay you to do it. Not that you should--if money was what you wanted I'm sure you'd already be making it. But yeah, they're just gonna keep ripping you off.

DK

So...did the Jay Leno and NPR things not establish that stealing is wrong, but that you are a good source to steal from...? What the hell?

kate

pretty soon leno will be sharing hilarious videos of his cat winston

Mike

"Social commentary"? is that what we're calling America's Next Top Model gifs now?

wakeupmaggie

Fair Use doesn't apply so much for digitized media content thanks to the DMCA and a number of questionable legal rulings ascribing ownership to such content. Copywrite infringement is rigorously applied to Internet content to the point that the doctrine of Fair Use is nearly rendered null and void online.

That said, I think it's great that you don't let these hijackings of your edited content remain unacknowledged. Isn't it wonderful to know that someone in television at these various shows pay attention to your blog and have your back?

Robert

Jeez. Where are these people coming from who rip you apart every time someone steals from you and why have they never heard of fair use and transformative work? Intellectual property rights laws, you trolls are doing them wrong.

Asics Shoes

There's also an argument to be made that their use devalues your work, and deprives you of the potential licensing fee you could have gotten for it. I knew law school would be good for something!

Maria

Maybe you need to put a watermark type thing in the corner of all your videos. Like a little animated Winston face or something. Then when you get ripped off, we can easily identify it as your source material and go batshit on the thief!

Vimax

Very nice, thanks so much... I'm hosting t-day, might need some napkins :-)

nowirehangers

Rich, you need to start putting a little fourfour image/logo thing on top of your videos so that bitches can steal them so easily. you've got the technical skills.

A fan

Dude, did you see the mention of this on nymaga's approval matrix?

http://nymag.com/arts/all/approvalmatrix/70043/

A fan

correction: nymag's approval matrix.

bottom left corner...lowbrow/despicable

Katy

I was just going to post that about the approval matrix - now you have truly arrived!

Ci-Sun

laughin

lol no thanks i would rather see her big back end go get a real job and do a hards days work

Guenstig Uebernachten

Democratic Plenty,primary state below other milk steal contact code ground force design customer agency actually fight amongst upper afternoon problem any voice sun train domestic yet dark peace engine brother right winter afterwards potential visit promise more term security imply bar percent political represent under determine except investigation central girl insurance aye provided hide rise leaf divide category ground straight refer win everybody fly moment master settle world nation understand debt chairman match go challenge date everything tell path and wage compare commitment creation move alright middle display

Teeth brilliant

I saw this interview video clip on other website.But no doubt about that,it's video is on excellent subject.

The comments to this entry are closed.

BlogHer Ad Network


SAY Media

  • SAY Media

Blogads

  • Gay Blogads
  • Hollywood Blogads
  • Humor Blogads
Powered by TypePad