I like dick, but I don't like Madonna and that makes me feel so very very very very very very very very alone.
FOD might as well be changed to FOM for all the gay love Madonna receives for just showing up (which is all she does on the beyond-dull Confessions on a Dance Floor, a record so wooden it might as well contain the confessions of a dance floor, but more on that in a sec). What bothers me is not the acceptance, but the seeming blindness of many of the above-linked reviews and reports that comes with the acceptance: they lavish praise without bothering to explain why (the worst culprit is the yeah-yeah-yeah-whatever-of-course-of-course 'tude of the Queerty link -- so much for "useful information" and not feeding into stereotypes). To a large chunk of mostly white, mostly well-off, mostly youngish, mostly tech-savvy gay men, Madonna is great, duh, except for when she's absolutely unbearable (and many a homo still will defend American Life, a record so confused and ultimately stupid that it couldn't even manage to be lucidly hypocritical). The gay default musical taste is Madonna. She is the fail-safe choice, the aural equivalent of shopping at the Gap.
While there, keep in mind that on Wednesdays, we wear pink.
As someone who loves pop music, I can't exclude myself from those who have appreciated Madonna's output. Before 1996's Evita, in fact, I was a huge fan, but then, I was also a teenager. What eventually repelled me was her noxious mixture of triteness and arrogance, two things I wasn't equipped to take issue with or even be aware of at such a young age. When both came to a point most clearly ("I wanted to put a face on it," she said of Ray of Light's take on electronic music, as though people like Donna Summer, Bernard Sumner and Björk never existed or made videos or were somewhat iconic themselves), I'd had enough. What was liking her worth, anyway? She can't really sing (though it's reasonable that you could like her voice the way you like your culinarily untrained mother's cooking). She can't write. She's savvy and sometimes quick-witted, but rarely does she exhibit the kind of intellect she'd love for us to believe that she possesses. I don't care about dancing or mysticism or flashes of contrived modesty. Yes, she supports the gay community, and has forever, but must that come with the cost of punishment through having to endure babble? Despite her practical reservation on at least one rung of the gay gene's helix, Madonna has very little to offer me (in fact, her music that I still enjoy -- mostly that of her debut album, before she created her know-it-all/know-nothing persona -- I enjoy despite her).
The feminist in me applauds Madonna and recognizes her boldness as a pioneer in the mainstream discourse of women's sexuality; the fag in me turns up my nose at the bait she's dangling in front of me (oooh, dance music!). Not that the package is so attractive, anyway -- Confessions on a Dance Floor thumps and thumps but fails to blow the roof off this sucker with its maudlin, clanking and mushy production and default mode of tunelessness (Stuart Price, whose participation had me interested in this album in the first place, bows under the weight of Madonna's whip, no doubt). The notion that Madonna should do anything but turn out mindless dance music is absurd -- I mean, really, these are her confessions? In her lyrics, my friend Sal Cinquemani hears "cliches [turned] into pop slogans," but what I hear is someone who has virtually nothing to say, whose dry, somnambulist delivery (once the charisma-filled redemption to her technical shortcomings) bespeaks motions that are just being gone through because it's been two and a half years and it's time to make a new record. I hear a supposedly intelligent woman who, without a trace of irony, will pepper her lyrics with: "Love at first sight"; "You're not half the man you think you are"; "Save you words because you've gone too far"; "At the point of no return"; "Hearts that intertwine"; "I'm going down my own road"; "The only thing you can depend on is your family." I hear someone butchering the English language just so we can hear her voice.
That isn't generosity, you know.
But then, what can be expected from a woman whose idea of a poem goes like this:
I have a cage
It's called the stage
When I'm let out
I run about
And sing and dance and sweat and yell
I have so many tales to tell
I like to push things to the edge
And inch my way along the ledge
I feel like God, I feel like shit
The paradox, an even split
It's just a job, I always say
I should be grateful everyday
Sometimes I think I just can't do it
But I persist and I get through it
And I console myself each night . . .
This poem is from her tour documentary I'm Going To Tell You a Secret, which I had prepared to tear apart in this very space before I saw it. Instead, though, I found the film oddly moving, despite being marred by an abundance of (live renditions of) her more recent music and her unfailing sense of entitlement. It was actually at this point in the film that I decided I wouldn't be recapping, as it just struck me as too sad and pathetic to laugh at publicly. I pitied her myopic view of poetry, her reliance on the most obvious of rhymes and her trusted cliches (we now know why the caged bird performs). It seems that there's a cage around not just her outer life, but her inner one as well, limiting self-expression that sometimes desperately wants out.
But after viewing the willfully nonobjective "criticism" that emerged in the wake of Confessions on a Dance Floor's Internet leak, I feel the need to expose just how easy it is to point out her creative deficiency. Andy Towle posted his review just a few hours after the album leaked. So quick and unquestioning is the piece that you get the feeling that the record could have sounded like anything any it would have elicited the same praise.
What bothers me the most about Andy's review and the many, many that have popped up in a row like smiling Stepford flowers, is that the vehicle for the gushing is what could be used to stop it: the Internet. One thing I've left out in my criticism of her is Madonna's frequent borrowing from the underground, something that doesn't bother me as much as it's come to bore me. See, at various points in time leading up to the dawn of the Internet's vitalness as a source of information, Madonna's flagrant cultural mining was actually useful in exposing Middle America to sights, sounds and, effectively, cultural experiences it never would bother to access, but more importantly, couldn't access. Technology, though, has come close to deeming this and her irrelevant (lest we're counting on Madonna's interpretive skills, and I hope that I've at least proved why I'm not). You can, for example, open up a P2P that will allow you to download hundreds of Italo disco tracks that "Hung Up" and "Forbidden Love" aspire to sounding like. You can go back with a click and listen to the French filter house that "Get Together" ganks (Andy correctly points to Stardust's "Music Sounds Better With You" as a reference point on that one, and just invoking that bit of musical sunshine is what makes "Get Together" work better than anything else on the record, by the way). Without having to blow off dusty vinyl, you can hear why "Future Lovers" is such a boneheaded effrontery to its infinitely richer sampled source, Donna Summer's "I Feel Love."
(It's important to note here that M.I.A., who similarly puts chutzpah before technique [more honestly than Madonna, even], seems to have the right idea for culturally mining, or as Simon Reynolds somewhat infamously put it, exhibiting "great taste in Other People's Music," as she dines out on cultures that have very little to do with the Internet/digital lifestyle. M.I.A.'s cultural reporting via using sounds like bhangra and favela funk in a pop context is, at the very least, a lot less obvious than the I'm-sure-paid-no-attention-to-electroclash ideal of Confessions.)
This is not to attack anyone's taste (certainly, as someone who's constantly looking for ideas to explore here and who's critical in nature, I benefit from and enjoy a difference of opinion), but to question it and to throw out a rare voice of dissent. Is it really a matter of taste, anyway? When unanimous, knee-jerk praise supersedes the notion of objectivity, we're looking at something that would be so easy to write off as groupthink if this collective obsession with Madonna didn't start in childhood for so many (what came first: Madonna or the gay?). That I don't devour the shit she flings at me doesn't make me better than my fellow homosexuals, probably just bitchier (certainly, there's a host of what you could call "gay music" that I love a lot, starting with house). And (here's my confession), I'm probably doing a bit of overcompensating in the face of all the unconditional love. I can't help it. Like Madge says herself, nobody's perfect.
At least we can all agree on that, right?
i love how you overthink, rich. there's love in it, and we need it.
my two cents? madonna let us down long ago. her early tracks (holiday, where's the party) revealed a sweet and naive desire to save the world with the beat; i understand that feeling...i even kind of agree with it. it is what madonna went and did with her hopeful dance energy that leaves me feeling short-changed. she went on to use every trick in the book to make us believe that she was the indespensible queen of a what is, as rich has pointed out, a stolen and sampled empire. madonna let us down, she could have laughed and shrugged and admitted she was not the center of the universe. we still would have loved her for being sassy, for being a great dancer, for not holding back. instead she became bitchy and superior: once she asked "where's the party?"....now you get the sense that she knows where the party and that we are not invited. she's a bourgeois characture of her idealistic 26 year-old self. where IS the party, madonna? because i do want to free my soul....maybe after Brittney Spears will come up with something?
Posted by: rebecca | November 07, 2005 at 07:33 PM
Thanks for writing a great review, one that eloquently transcends the typical "this sucks" culture and yet lays waste to the myth of Madonna as Queen Of All Gays.
Posted by: moogaboo | November 07, 2005 at 09:32 PM
all i have to say about this record which i basicaly barely even think about. i never even looked for the leak. anyways all i have to say is Kelly Osbourne did this whole electro house pop shit like months ago.
if Kelly Osbourne is beating you by 4 months...
Posted by: princemoney | November 07, 2005 at 09:33 PM
Thank you for being thoughtful & original & inspiring the same in your readers.
Madgie is totally not my kind of music (since I was 10 & had her pins all over my M.O. jacket), but every time she puts out a new CD, there is so much hype I feel like I should give it a listen. Then, time & again, I am just, plain, bored by the lyrics & overall repetitiveness.
I guess she's, like, an institution now & people are scared to criticize her (it.) Wow, I guess the world really does spin round, eh?
Posted by: nicole | November 07, 2005 at 10:24 PM
jb says: "Ironically, Foxy's advice is the exact point of the album: Take your own life - don't give yourself away to anybody else. You are the master of your identity and ultimately your destiny".
It sounds like either jb is unaware that to "take your own life" means to kill yourself, or is attempting a play on words to twist Foxy's words into "take ownership of your own life." If it's the latter, then I have to point out that Madonna is not a likely poster child for not "giving oneself away." True she hasn't GIVEN herself away, but she certainly has made of a career of SELLING herself away. Everything she has, she owes to adopting new image after new image that are only a means for increasing her appeal. It's not like there's some integrity to herself, but quite the opposite.
Posted by: Mr. Dr. | November 07, 2005 at 10:32 PM
ouch, i don't know what stung worst... probably being lumped in with those other blogs. (hee hee) i'm happy you are leading the parade against Madge. she's an ass, her talent is limited to say the least, that movie gave me a headache. but sometimes our childhood fascinations die hard. i do love the cd, i'd be a liar if I said I didn't, it reminds me of Kylie's "Fever" another gay cd i loved without any intellectualized explaination. I happily take my fourfour spanks though, and hope future PopMuse Posts on New Edition and O'Brien win back his respect.
Posted by: Pop Muse | November 08, 2005 at 12:17 AM
What? People still think bashing Madonna makes them sound smart and sophisticated!?
Posted by: Aiisha | November 08, 2005 at 01:03 AM
Wow, this is an extremely well written and thought provoking piece! Kudos, Rich.
I do agree with quite a few of your points. I've never been a huge Madonna fan, I surely cannot get through a full album of hers, but she's had some great pop tunes in her heyday. However, her last few endeavors have reaked of this sort of almost desperation (calculation has always been her thing, it's what she does, and admittedly she does it well, but she's never came off as trying too hard), and I think her newest album is her most cynical yet (though it must be said that I think "Hung Up" is her best single in ages, although it is pretty much a non-song and it's 'genius', if you want to call it that,' is all in the sample), it's an obvious pandering to her core demographic, yet they all eat it up without the slightest bit of questioning (don't you find it a bit odd that after her worst performing album and an almost ruined public image, she goes and makes an album that is so limited in it's scope, an album that pretty obviously appeals to those who eat up anything she spits out? Madonna has always said that fame is her drug, and with the whole Die Another Day/American Life/ Me Against The Music fiasco, her grasp on it, or at least her relevance in pop culture, was dwindling).It's rather odd. Especially consdiering that she is so obviously NOT a Disco Diva anymore.
I do agree with you that COADF, and really most of Madonna's output, is sort of faceless and nondescript. But I'd be a liar if I said I didn't enjoy some of the songs on this latest release. As I said earlier, "Hung Up" is an excellent single (though, as I've admitted, there isn't really much to it), "Get Together" is a great filer-house type track, "Isaac" is a really interesting melding of sounds, and "Sorry" has a great bassline.. but really, Madonna has nothing to do with ths. In fact, I think many of these tunes would be much better with, say, Kylie or that chick from The Knife or Annie or whomever singing over them. Madonna's lyrics are constantly unbearable and trite, her vocal melodies are somewhat uninteresting, etc.
And yeah I also agree that Stuart Price has done a bit of a half-assed job with the production/beats here.
Well anyway enough of me, I don't have much to say (and I'm not particulalry articulate) on this issue compared to you anyway. But yeah.. great review man, and an awesome blog as well.
Posted by: Pigs In Shit. | November 08, 2005 at 01:31 AM
Here's my question, though, Rich: *does* she really take herself too seriously, or is it us who take her too seriously? I'll give you that the Kabbalah era has been a little meh, but still...
Posted by: Carly | November 08, 2005 at 01:39 AM
I've done more thinking about Madonna today than I ever wanted to in my life, so yeah, I totally see your point.
But then, I see Maddyface:
"That's why I called it Confessions on a Dance Floor," Madonna explains. "Most people equate dance music with being fluffy and superficial; it's just about having fun. That's fine, but I can't write 12 songs about nothing. My feelings or point of view inevitably sneaks in."
Posted by: Rich | November 08, 2005 at 01:59 AM
It's funny that she hides under this facade of "depth" and "meaning" with her latter albums (or may she really believes what she's saying, who knows) when, really, her songs ARE about nothing, and if they do try and tackle broader issues her words are so trite that you wonder what the point was.
Posted by: Pigs In Shit. | November 08, 2005 at 02:06 AM
i've finally realised that madonna relies too heavily on image, what you think of with her or associate with madonna is too much to do with the surface...the videos and her looks, if you stripped all that way would the music hold up some of it will, what if she was fat and ugly make so so videos would she still be popular sell millions? like i said image but after hearing "hung up" i was disappointed it was lyrically weak and it was all about the abba sample, she is not a musical genius, there is shallowness with madonna its very calculated not organic its not real enough
madonna seems to borrow alot from people and trends what she is good at is surrounding herself with talented people like best photographers, designers, directors, image makers, producers etc they shape her but you see madonna but is a well crafted illusion made up of hype, image and 'some' good music
only a deluded madonna fan would disagree with what i'm about to write, she isn't a great vocalist she has not got alot of range and power, she is not a daring songwriter and resorts to cliches, she isn't really a producer, what she does is tell her producers to change something and play it again for her until she likes it
madonna is the queen at marketing its about business it has very little to do with music with art, she is just so caclulated, polished and slick but there is no soul there no substance she attracts shallow people, madonna is slowly starting to fade she can't keep this up the dancing, her looks, her body, strip her off these things are you are left with not very much its time to grow up i wish she realises this and matures a bit
Posted by: chris | November 08, 2005 at 07:47 AM
Thanks for your eloquent critique on the hyping of Madonna. I'm just frightened by the fact that despite her mimicking abilities she hasn't yet learned out to blink in a human-like manner. I guess that something the reptilians haven't figure out yet. I will say, I did like her much better in the good ol' days when she was just a big whore and not a pontificating hypocrite.
Posted by: mfcohen | November 08, 2005 at 09:25 AM
p.s. i'm surprised nobody found anything slightly ironic about the fact that the first five minutes (as far as i could stand to watch!) of her "documentary" were about her need to become more humble and minimize her tremendous ego as part of her "desire for spiritual growth" . ummmmmmmm......try not making a documentary about yourself for starters. DOH!
Posted by: mfcohen | November 08, 2005 at 09:28 AM
I guess I can't really complain about free music, but, when it comes to wasting the precious life of a CD in a pack of 100 for $7, I have to stand up. This album was hardly worth the 60 MB I had to spare for a night to store it and burn it, or the 30 minutes I spent waiting for it to finish. With only a few likable tracks it's hard to find any depth at all in any of her music. I've found more depth in Britney Spears' first CD than in 'Confessions on a Dance Floor.'
When music is supposed to be not only fun but a social commentary, and with a heavy title like 'Confessions' carries, you expect to hear SOMETHING of substance. Madonna fails to deliver, other than a few fun beats that you might be able to dance to mindlessly, but listening to it would be utter torture.
Posted by: Kyrie | November 08, 2005 at 09:34 AM
Honestly, guys, the fact that you're all dissecting Madge - whether positive or negative - is yet another job done for Madonna. Somewhere, she is smiling.
Shouldn't you be defending lesser-known artists or, say, reading Hobbes rather than analyzing (to death) an established performer destined for the history books who can still whip crowds into a frenzy over twenty-two years into her career, regardless of intent, meaning, or quality?
Really, those who "hate" Madonna or her product so passionately fuel the iconic hype. Keep it coming and the legend will just grow.
Posted by: nyc | November 08, 2005 at 11:11 AM
can someone please justify how madonna can spend $20,000 on diamond eyelashes when she performed 'hung up' on mtv ema's?? wouldn't that money be better spent elsewhere like on charity, its not like anyone can notice the difference,
she is such a hypocrite and has has double standards how can we take her seriously when she says shes humble and wants us to give to charity acting like that, she seems so childish and needs to learn not to be so shallow and into her looks so much but its the hype that makes people believe she is this 'queen of pop' wake up people don't be sucked in by the hype and media she exploits!!
Posted by: brad | November 08, 2005 at 11:12 AM
MuthaFUCK Madonna.
There I said it.
Posted by: Fresh | November 08, 2005 at 12:54 PM
Rich I don't usually read articles that long, but that shit was hot. And we know we see eye to eye on this madness.
Posted by: Michael K | November 08, 2005 at 01:20 PM
"Driving in my Mini Cooper and I'm feeling super-duper"
And that's just about all I want to hear. 'Nuff said.
Posted by: chad | November 08, 2005 at 01:20 PM
And to think that I used to bartender for her parties in Miami...
Posted by: Gary | November 08, 2005 at 01:48 PM
all i know is this. i hate cats, yet you wont find me on websites posting to death how much i hate cats and cant believe that people like cats cuz cats are culturally irrelevant, unoriginal, lame, bony and old.
give a girl a break! she's sold over 150 million albums of music. that is like a bajillion minutes of aural pleasure. lets see you do that.
haters.
love you madonna!
xo
Posted by: JUSTICE | November 08, 2005 at 02:09 PM
oh god- criticizing Madonna? what will they think of next.
Posted by: Jim | November 08, 2005 at 02:10 PM
Look Madonna fans, I've been a lifelong Prince fan so I know how it feels when something you love has become culturally irrelevant. It happened to me and now it's happening to you. If Prince has been any indication, the live shows will never, ever disappoint. Take solace in that.
Posted by: janine | November 08, 2005 at 02:20 PM
Ya know, you just sound kinda bitter and weird.
Posted by: Mercy | November 08, 2005 at 02:20 PM