Earlier this year, I attended a screening of the short film Tales of Times Square at the Museum of Sex. The movie is ostensibly a documentary weaving together the seedy and sad stories of three Times Square patrons of the early '80s - arguably the filthiest time period in the filthiest part of the filthiest city in this filthy world, when the streets were paved with whores, porn, drugs and exploitation as entertainment. Sounds like a party to me! The idea of a place that trashy has long had me salivating (if only I had Hepatitis, for more appropriately thematic salivating!). Also, it adds a layer of irony to my already ironic current relationship with Times Square: if I didn't have to go there everyday for work, I would never visit the overcrowded, overpriced ($5 a day...for coffee!) tourist trap. Unless, of course, I could travel simultaneously uptown and back in time.
Paul Stone, the director of Tales of Times Square, seemed to share my fetishization for the gory days, as he enthused in a post-film Q&A about his trips to the hotbed of hot mess as a kid. His film, it turns out, is not a documentary but a rather convincing recreation of events that kinda-sorta happened decades ago (it borrows from, but doesn't replicate, Josh Alan Friedman's collection of essays of the same name). Faking it is the only way to make it, according to Stone (and reinforced by Friedman, who also attended the screening), as pre-Disney Times Square went largely undocumented (lest someone be willing to go through thousands of hours of archival news footage to piece together a documentary...hey, hands off my fucking obsessive idea!). And though Friedman's book is a lot more conflicted about the place (on one hand, there were tons of vivid characters; on the other, there were tons of child pornography), the overarching mood is also one of enchantment with all of the area's debased charms.
But it turns out that Stone's lens might as well be rose-colored. Though there's little readily available footage specifically of the late-70's/early-80's grindhouse-era Times Square, there's plenty to take in that suggests that this virulently unpleasant area was, in fact, an unpleasant place to be. I know, typing it out like that makes me realize that I was an idiot for ever believing that it was anything but. But, I don't know, sometimes you're watching Cannibal Ferox on your couch and thinking about the anti-glamorization detailed in Sleaziod Express and how much more amazing the movie would be heard through blown-out speakers, watched in the company of men who smell like masturbation who would stab you as soon as they'd jerk you off.
Whatever. The point is that there are some artifacts that present pre-Disney Times Square as the indefensible hole I'm increasingly convinced that it was. One is the amazing documentary The Gods of Times Square, which profiles the pre-Disney tension of the religious nuts who polluted the place with incoherent noise in the late '80s (and also which probably deserves its own post). The second, which is much more to the point is Charlie Ahearn's Doin' Time in Times Square. In 1986, the Wild Style director set up camp at an apartment on 8th Avenue and 43rd, where he lived with his wife and toddler son. He was so enthralled by the action on the street below that he'd film from his window. That's basically all Doin' Time is - a series of soulless encounters that were never supposed to make it to film and thus are all the more enthralling. It's a plot-free parade of depraved humanity (intercut with actual home movies, like footage from his son's birthday) with as little self-consciousness as possible. Because those who dance to hip-hop, rob, assualt and and wail for God's help below had no idea they were being filmed, I'm more likely to trust Ahearn's vision of Times Square (note that it was filmed after crack hit, so it could very well have been a nastier time than that which Stone and Friedman rhapsodize). But still! "People who are nostalgic about this crack-infested spot that was Times Square in the '80s have to, you know, really examine their brains a little bit," says Ahearn in a supplemental extra on the DVD. Consider me examined!
Below is maybe the most shocking clip from the movie -- a guy gets knocked out and then robbed. Repeatedly. The pick-pockets swarm like roaches. Bleak, bleak shit. It's a nice place to visit but...no it isn't.
The music synced with the video has that carnival sound, along with what seems to be happily tweeting birds, not unlike Disney movies. Bleak is right! When I lived in NYC, I got to see both the seedy side of Times Square along with the eventual Disneyization of it, and I can see what you're saying about pre-Lion King being the good old days. Well, maybe that's taking it a little far, but there was nothing more depressing than walking around Times Square in the late 90's with visiting friends and being completely, totally, utterly safe. Not a threat in sight, nor a thrill for that matter. In fact, there were more policemen on the sidewalks than tourists at that hour.
Jules
House of Jules
Posted by: HouseofJules | August 20, 2008 at 03:11 AM
jesus christ. I too am more than a little guilty of reminiscing over pre-touristy Times Square (hello Gaiety), but this sort of douses that wishful dreaming.
Posted by: dean | August 20, 2008 at 07:02 AM
Is that what native New Yorkers want the city to return to? I'm all for preserving history but some things just have to go. I thought that's what New York was built on... change. It's odd that there are people out there that confuse crime with culture.
Posted by: Brandon H | August 20, 2008 at 07:07 AM
Wow. That was so depressing to watch. Who would ever want to go back to that??
Posted by: Bridget | August 20, 2008 at 09:09 AM
I didn't view the clip based on how you described it Rich - but your first paragraph brought me down memory lane.
While it might have been towards the "end" of the great Times Square era, I remember as a gay teen going to the Adonis theatre just north of T.S. back in '87/'88 - nothing says "times are a changin" when I think about how the last time I went there it made me ill seeing the Disney transformation...
C'mon - what teenage boy in N.Y. didn't enjoy going one block in that area without
1) Getting a skuzzy prostitute hitting you up
2) Getting a skanky drug drealer hitting you up
3) Being able to go into one of the adult bookstores and get your cock sucked through a glory hole (they should put a glory hole in the Smithsonian since they've becoming virtually extinct like the dinosaur).
Such good times... is it any wonder I now live in Vegas; the city of sin?
Posted by: Steve Abramson | August 20, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Oh - P.S. - Museum of Sex???????????
Only in New York (I seriously had to google it to believe it with my own eyes).
In Vegas we get Elvis and Liberace museums... I want a sex museum dammit!!! (Hell I'll volunteer to be the living gay man exhibit hehe)
Posted by: Steve Abramson | August 20, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Only in New York my ass. Miami has its very own [url=http://www.weam.com/]sex museum[/url], as opened by a little old lady. Seriously.
Posted by: Laurie | August 20, 2008 at 10:51 AM
I recently started reading Watchmen. It's set in 80s New York, in an alternate reality where early super hero comics inspired masked costume vigilante justice. No one actually has super powers (with a single exception) they're just people who are disgusted with humanity. But the irony is, a lot of them have their own sick reasons for wanting to fight crime--it's implied that many of them are sadists, and just get off on beating up strangers.
The main character, Rorschach, wears a mask of a shifting inkblot test. The plot focuses on the murder of a former vigilante hero, 'The Comedian', and the more it reveals about his past, the more despicable he comes. It's funny because (so far, I haven't finished it) there are no real villains in the story, and the heroes themselves are no less depraved than the people they are fighting.
"Beneath me, this awful city, it screams like an abattoir full of retarded children. New York."
Anyway, if you haven't read it, you should pick it up. I recently purchased it at Midtown Comics, which is pretty appropriate. It's also next door to my office.
Also, they're making it into a movie, but you probably knew that: http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/watchmen/
Posted by: BradOFarrell | August 20, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Wow. Dude didn't die? He looked dead. I was hoping they'd show him get up and walk away before the clip ended.
And I must agree with the commentator before me - The Watchmen is amazing. And ties in well with this post. :)
Posted by: Maria | August 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM
If you notice, the guy in the tan jacket retrieves the man's wallet and gives it back to the victim.
Posted by: soulbrotha | August 20, 2008 at 12:39 PM
A lot of NYC in the early 80s was hellish--and even worse after crack. I got to watch it happen as I'd visit my friends in various neighborhoods over the years. Parts of Brooklyn would go from run-down but livable, to really fucking dangerous, day or night. Cops told me about drug-dealer apartments that were booby-trapped with axes that would fall on you if you tried to crawl through the windows (triggered by fishing line). Whee!
You can see some 70s-era Times Square in "Born to Win" starring George Segal as a junkie(!) I don't know how available this 1971 movie is, but it's bleak and seems to capture a downer druggie era. As opposed to an upper druggie era.
Posted by: Miss Lisa | August 20, 2008 at 01:07 PM
My boyfriend and I are of a considerable age difference, and I'm constantly bitching about the sugaryness of Times Square now, but as a Latino in the 70's-80's, he's not reminiscing over rape, crack, robberies, etc, but just the raw grittiness of it all. He was a "bomber" in the subways (graffiti writer) with Lady Pink and Keith Haring. He hung out at block parties and scratch sessions with Afrika Bambataa and the like. No one from the b-boy/dj/art/gay era of those times misses the dirt and violence, but the energy and ideas flowing from every corner of the city. There was excitement that anything could happen and new cultures were forming. What my 20-something generation wants is more richness and excitement and hope in our lives that creativity is still evolving like in the 70's and 80's...that we're not going to keep living in a world where The Hills and My Super Sweet Sixteen is considered "edgy." If that's going to happen I say bring back glory holes!!!
Posted by: Leanne | August 20, 2008 at 01:36 PM
I totally want to see Doin Time in Times Square now.
Now for the real purpose of my post (I thought I'd post on topic first. ;) )
I LOVE today's hoodie and I totally buying one as soon as I get my credit card from g/friend who holds on to it to prevent me from making JUST such purchases. I'll convince her anyway.
lol
Posted by: MsKit2u | August 20, 2008 at 01:47 PM
What this makes me think of is Dennis Cooper's 5-part series, "The George Miles Chronicles." I'm sure some have read them, but if you have not, it's some fucked up shit about sex, mutalation, death, and much more. After reading the series, I read that these stories were Cooper's way of dealing with his own feelings of violence and sex with this other man. Do we really want our desires or anti-desires? And what happens when we get them?
Growing up in a gang-filled neighborhood in Chicago, I have been slight witness to some bad shit. I mean, I grew up with a great family that sheltered me from that a bit, and it was never to the extreme of that video, but I know I am tired of gang violence. However, as my neighborhood is under gentrification, I know what it is to want a realness back. Maybe that's what that glamor might be?
That also brings me to a different point. Why do you continue to live in the past? I mean, even with the internet, I find that we just save the past and keep living it in our heads. Are things really that bad in the present? Is is just human nature?
Posted by: Fredo | August 20, 2008 at 02:09 PM
And don't forget the 1980 gem "Times Square" about a pair of misfit girls fighting against the Times Square clean-up. Features Tim Curry as a DJ.
Here's the trailer.
Posted by: Rain | August 20, 2008 at 02:12 PM
To be fair, I think it's probably easier to be nostalgic for a time/place like 70s' Times Square when you haven't really lived through it.
For every sleazoid celebration, there's a Midnight Cowboy or a Travis Bickle that reminds me to relish my safe, yuppie life.
Though I admit, the Times Square Olive Garden is a bit much.
Posted by: | August 20, 2008 at 03:05 PM
COOLEST. VID. EVAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
watching it hasm ade me so horny that I whipped out my 1" cock and started flogging it until I jizzed all over the keyboard and monitor and then I licked off all of the jizz. Now I'm going to go shoot up some horse and then come back and watch the vid over and over and over again, jacking off whilst doing so.
Posted by: Trevor "Saint Nightwalker" Valle | August 20, 2008 at 04:09 PM
I was at that MoSex screening too. The whole documentary/fake documentary thing was sketchy. Even after Paul Stone's Q&A session, I walked away being a bit confused. Paul kept referring to it as a "documentary," and it's been marketed as a documentary. But like you said, it's all new footage, since there's apparently not enough authentic footage from back then. So it's NOT a documentary--it's a dramatization. The whole thing seemed somewhat misleading.
Posted by: Leah | August 20, 2008 at 06:23 PM
A memory from pre-Guiliani NYC... I visited the city with my family around 1985... I was seven years old... We went to Washington Square Park. We were walking around and every step we took there were sounds like we were stepping on glass... I looked down and picked something up. It was a crack vial. There were literally millions of small crack vials CARPETING the park. You could not take a step without smashing one.
Posted by: rhino | August 20, 2008 at 08:50 PM
I don't know what it says about me, but having been a kid in NYC in the 80s, that video didn't seem all that bleak to me. That's probably not a good thing though... :\
Posted by: studpup | August 20, 2008 at 09:40 PM
I used to live in Hell's Kitchen, pre-gentrification. Times Square was a hellhole. When you walked west on 42 Street, as soon as you crossed over Seventh Ave. you could feel a cloud of soul-sucking evil and sadness envelop you. The ONLY thing I miss about those days is that you could walk sidewalks relatively free of all those fucking tourists.
Posted by: growler | August 20, 2008 at 09:40 PM
Posted by: Rain | August 20, 2008 at 02:12 PM, RE: movie "Times Square"
omg I loved that movie! Great soundtrack (Gary Numan, Roxy Music...) and its stars the actress I call the pre-Jolie. She was the beta Angelina Jolie.
I can see the nostalgia for earthy/seedy as opposed to cynical corporate Disneyfication, but the truth is that dealing with a street that resembles the Dawn of the fucking Dead is no fun. Market Street in SF had a few grindhouse movie theaters. I remember cutting school to go to see an Andy Warhol triple feature at the Strand. The Strand is no longer but Market Street remains a fucking shithole. Although I do not wish for a Times Square II, it would be nice if it didn't resemble and smell like Night of the Living Dead (braaaaaiiiins.)
Posted by: mariaaaaa | August 21, 2008 at 03:51 AM
Man, that is bleak! Was the guy dead?? At the very least there were concerned strangers to get him out of the street and dump a few buckets of water on him. Lordy.
Posted by: Nikita Tinypaws | August 21, 2008 at 11:25 AM
It wasn't just Times Square it was all over the island in surprising places. Yes I remember the hookers, the hustler bars, all that City of Night, John Rechy filhy gorgeous glamour shit and it was exciting and it was terrifying and everyone had an attitude because the only way to keep them off you was to seem even crazier and more dangerous than they. It was not that long ago and it was a world away, gay was an underground culture, not a market demographic and it was exhausting then, back when dinosaurs ruled the earth.
Posted by: Nonplussed | August 21, 2008 at 12:11 PM
I, too, am just old enough to remember Times Square pre-Disney, and I think the only reason why it's remembered so *fondly* is because the Disneyfied Times Square is also such an extreme in the other way, with no personaity whatsoever.
Posted by: liz | August 21, 2008 at 02:16 PM