« Put one hand in the air | Main | Winston's brush with celebrity »

August 10, 2009


John Foley

I've heard some stories about Channing Tatum's crotch, and it's most definitely not described as "smooth."


I was so let down when I first heard that a GI Joe movie was coming into play.
Then I had some sort of hope that it would be mildly amusing.
Then all those hopes were flushed away when I found that it was a giant toy advertisement with B rate actors straight from the set of some made for Sci-Fi (or should I say Sy-Fy?) movie. BAH


I also do not get Channing Tatum. Like, at all. There have to be people out there who find him likable or attractive, but I have yet to meet one.


Roger Ebert's opening line for his review is pretty awesome (and similar to yours).


This movie was full on crap with the following exceptions

* The fight scenes with young Snake Eyes and Young Storm Shadow

* The fight scenes with adult Snake Eyes and adult Storm Shadow

* Any moment Storm Shadow was on screen.

The rest was pure A+ garbage.



Dirty Blonde

He could be cute in that Cro-Magnon Neanderthal sort of way, but even then he'd still need to be hairy and by the looks of that link, he looks more like a resident of Chelsea or Hell's kitchen.


Why is Channing Tatum a star (let alone an 'actor')?

Can someone please take a few seconds to explain that to me?


He got worse as the movie went along. Brendan Frasier could have played the lead and left that cameo for someone else.

Blame Canada

There has to be someone else to blame for Channing Tatum. America CANNOT be responsible for that guy. (Please?)


He has a penis. It's true.


I saw G.I. Joe last night.

It was just a series of explosions, fighting and destruction. Awful.


Channing Tatum IS SO fuckable!


He's so fucking hot.


I haven't seen the movie yet, but I want to watch it because of one reason and for that reason only:
G.I. Joe = Team America: World Police: Real Life Edition

...But now that you say they're totally acting like action figures totally wipes out the "Real Life" part.


LMFAO i think there's only like 4 people in this world (myself included) who don't find him bang-worthy... at all. i'd rather hit that wayans bro any day! :D


IDGAF about Channing Tatum, I want to see this for my husband in my head Christopher Eccleston. Can I just go see it for him?

Golden J

I'm sure your review is spot-on accurate, but Channing Tatum is soooooo fuckable.


Fit doesn't equal fuckable.

Channing's a butter face. He's little dull looking, like you could get more human interaction out of wood slab or a cold stone; Both of which, by the way, have more acting talent and model potential than Mr. Tatum.

I prefer a face with personality and character, not something that looks like it was made by Cro-mag Mattel. He does have a nice body, if you like that anatomically-correct-GI-Joe-waxy-plastic-doll type (I don't particularly).


Christopher Eccleston is farrrrrr sexier.


I've got to chime in to agree with Courtie and Harriet - Christopher Eccleston is far, far, far sexier and probably the only reason to go see the movie.

(Now the challenge is to find a place to go see the movie where no one knows me so I don't have to explain the indignity of buying a ticket to see GI Joe...)


I agree with Harriet. Eccleston is hotter. Hell, Louie Anderson is hotter than Channing Tatum. OK, that's a stretch, but I just. don't. dig. his. rap.

Also, what's with Tatum's character wearing a keffiyah with his uniform? No US soldier would be caught dead wearing a Palestinian scarf.


Okay, I am watching it now.
Uhhhh.....yeah. Even Eccleston couldn't save this POS.
Honestly, the only good parts are Eccleston and JGL's scenes. And JGL's scenes are only good because they are FUCKING HILARIOUS. He looks like a reject character from the Hellboy franchise.
Just... just give this one a miss, everyone.


What about sienna miller? Isn't she in it?


499 x 683 - 116k - jpg

Pls to enjoy.

The comments to this entry are closed.